- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Pin this Topic for Current User
- Follow
- Printer Friendly Page
Empathy
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
If we asked people on the street if they had a family member with depression what that persons greatest need was you might get the following responses-
- Sympathy
- Sleep
- Dominance from myself
- More medication
- More therapy
- Theyve just got to snap out of it
However, in general, I would propose that EMPATHY is the most valued quality a carer, family member or friend could possess.
Someone that shows empathy is a listener, they are genuinely concerned and they have a rare ability of having the capacity of “walking in your shoes”. Someone able to do that is rare because being able to extend your kindness to someone with an illness they cannot see, restrictions that aren’t obvious and internal turmoil usually invisible, takes a special human being.
For us that need such empathy the least we can do is return some of it. Carers need support as well and such support can be given even as tokenism by way of a cuppa when they return from work, for example.
Back to the mentally unwell. There are various levels of empathy. In my experience and I could be wrong but the less empathy the more selfish a person can be or they have not acquired the basics in their childhood- to reach out. Regardless of the reason you will not transform a person into an empathetic person with demands nor any other method,
If you have a mental illness be wary of your need for empathy in others. Sadly, you might, like me, reduce your social circle to include only such quality people...
Mixing with people with empathy and reducing contact with those that haven’t got that quality is a form of protection along with a means to be much happier.
What are your major needs from other people?
TonyWK
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
Tony,
aht an intriguing and informative thread.
y problem is the word empathy seems to have changed menaing. I was taught that you could have symoathy with anyone but to have emoathy you must be abele to feel what they have felt.
There so many people that I cant have empathy for as I have never had a child die, I have never experienced a flood and I have never had a partner die. I can listen and offer concern but I cant offer empathy in my understanding of the word as I have not felt what they have.
I am going through a challenge of my own and some people say I understand what you are going through but how can they when they have not experienced what I have.
just my thoughts and others may differ.
my needs from other people
are a good listener
non judgmental
supportive
Quirky
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
Hi Quirky
I tend to see where you are coming from, but disagree.
In my opinion having empathy has its limits in terms of actually knowing how someone feels. Eg
A WW2 fighter pilot is interviewed in a documentary about his plane being destroyed and he bailed out wounded but survived. He describes his pain, his good fortune in surviving and how he lives with his injuries. His description of the whole story can draw empathy from others.
There would be another group of pilots that flew the same plane in the same war that didn’t get shot down... their understanding of the horror would contain more vision of what the pilot went through but still they would be imagining the parachute event.
Then there is pilots that went through the same event as that first pilot.
All 3 groups can have empathy for that pilot as to what he endured but all 3 would have various levels of knowledge on how it felt. So the knowledge level is varied but the empathy could be the same amount.
Lets return to a mere observer of the documentary, if he/she was to embark on studying all aspects of flying a ww2 aircraft, how to parachute, practice parachuting etc they would have a greater understanding of his experience but their empathy might well remain the same- high.
I see not many levels of empathy, your either empathetic or not, like kind or not, in love or not. But knowledge can be variable based on experience.
But I’m open to change of my views.
TonyWK
That how I see empathy.
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
I think empathy is not completely understanding another's situation. That would be impossible because even if we have the same experience we are different so feel it differently.
Empathy is a genuine desire to understand another person't point of view. This means really trying to imagine what it would be like for the other person. It involves asking appropriate questions to better understand & most importantly listening carefully. An empathetic person is a good listener, non judgemental & they can therefore be supportive as Quirky wanted. An empathetic person knows they don't understand fully but want to understand better.
This is very different to the person who claims to understand exactly how you feel. When someone claims that I shut off because they think they know everything so they don't see a need to listen or understand.
I remember going to a GP years ago to get some time off because i was really struggling due to a situation which had occured. He listened & then shared a personal experience of his own which related. He didn't pretend to understand fully but based on what he shared I felt understood & he normalised my reaction. I had been feeling really bad because I thought I was overreacting. His support & understanding really helped me to cope better & move forward
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
Hi Elizabeth
That is a good example of how someone can show empathy, for them to give a similar example of how the handled a situation or felt/reacted when a similar situation occurred.
I think we are all on different tracks travelling in the same direction on this so no answer is perfectly true to the meaning of empathy.
So, having said that, what if we labelled it-
to display concern in a manner that attempts to feel what another’s experience is, by various ways to visualise an event or experience a similar event that allows you to judge the effect that experience has had on that person. To be able to assist that person with the insight gained from life experiences.
Can we improve on that? Welcome to try,
TonyWK
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
Hi TonyWK
Thankyou for another excellent thread topic..
I always avoid not to 'overthink' anything anymore as it can sometimes invite anxious thoughts...
I have found reducing my already small social circle to include people that have a sincere 'care factor' and genuine empathy for my own mental health issues
Foe me this works....'to display concern in a manner that attempts to feel what another’s experience is'...Thanks for helping me out with this simple yet helpful sentence
Paul
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
Thankyou blondeguy for your input.
A thought returned to me today. Some years ago my wife (she has depression) had a down period. Her best friend now (but a distant friend at the time) rang her and my wife told her she was in bed and unwell. Her friend came over and did some housework (I was at work) and sat with her an hour chatting about everyday things then left.
I realised that empathy can come in other forms, in this case it didn’t involve talking about her illness.
TonyWK
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
Thanks tony and everyone,
think as I said it depends what you think empathy meansand maybe the menaing has changed.
was taught you could only have empathy if you had felt or experienced the same thing.
You could have sympathy and show kindness and concern.
I feel empathy is used a lot where sympathy is the more appropriate word but I may be just out of touch with semantics!
the word empathy is fats becoming overused and even losing its meaning.
Does it matter what we call it when someone is kind and shows understanding?
I feel the meaning of empathy has changed since my school days and maybe I will have to change as well.
Quirky
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
Hi quirky
language does change. I mean “gay” now has a sexuality meaning it never had when I was a boy.
The word “empathy “ has only struck a cord as someone without it as opposed to someone with it is vast in terms of treatment of the mentally impaired,
I suppose it is a thorn in my side that some humans choose not to give a little consideration to us.
But I take your point that there is another dimension to this, that empathy can only be possible through experience of the event.
Interesting.
TonyWK
- Mark as New
- Follow Post
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Post
Hi all,
According to the oxford dictionary:
Empathy - Power of projecting ones personality into & so fully comprehending
Sympathy - Participation in feeling, being affected similarly to another by his sensations
Compassion - Pity inclining one to spare or help
My interpretation is that you can show sympathy without needing or trying to understand, whereas empathy requires the ability & the willingness to put yourself into another's shoes & use your own life experiences to try to build a degree of understanding of what the other person is experiencing & how it may be affecting them. I will stress the "degree of understanding" as I believe that as we are all different we all experience things differently.
Paws