Yes... and no.
Slightly different here.
I get really worked up about people trying to tell me something works differently to how I understand it to work (sometimes). I won't say I spend a lot of time trying to prove my point or demonstrate what I am trying to say, but every time I see a piece of evidence to support my way of thinking it's sets my frustration off about the original "difference of opinions"
All my current frustrations are work related and also involve those taboo barriers (race, religion, gender...) so it's hard to explain what I mean without coming off as some kind of sexist racist.
I guess I can say about one example: I live in a very small community. Hypothetically, if it became known that a child received a poor health diagnosis then the community would rally behind that family and try and support them - confidentiality around the health scenario tends to disappear, but it's not a bad thing. I understand this doesn't necessarily happen in larger communities. This is the current "argument" with my boss - who (from a larger town, but not so large that the above mentioned community support is lacking) released confidential information to me, along these lines, without clarifying that it was confidential. He is now blaming me for a confidentiality breach in a situation where I was not aware that any "confidential" information had been shared. So, when I opened my web browser this morning and a news story came up about Gary Ablett's terminally ill child with his blessing for it to be public knowledge (evidence to support my side of the arguement) that set me right off... Today was a bad day
Sorry - hope that sorta makes sense...
But yeah, I too get a bit stuck on the evidence, just in a different way
